Saturday, May 26, 2007

Fighting Propaganda

I used to get frustrated at times when talking to people about ugly truths that aren't commonly known; for instance GMO's, vaccines, or false flag terror. The facts are different from the hype and propaganda that most Americans take as the gospel truth. Facts are facts, I don't make them up. I discover them, or uncover them, because the truth is routinely covered up. There is always a downside to everything and yet, Americans are supremely naive about that. We just swallow whole anything we're told. If it's some expert, or some politician, or some talking head on a TV news channel, we shut down every brain cell connected with critical thinking and just accept the download like little robots. You can't tell people anything to save their lives, they just refuse to click in and hear it.

For me, hearing something once that goes against the grain is something I take note of. But when I hear it over and again I have to find out what the deal is. Is there a problem or isn't there? Who is saying these things and why? What are the facts?

I think that's where I'm in a minority. Most never get to that point. They're exposed to the same public media as I am, so they hear exactly the same things I hear. They see exactly the same newscasts, read exactly the same newspapers, and hear exactly the same speeches from the mouths of politicians. But when the anomalies start popping up, they just tune them out, as if they were not there.

I can't respect that and frankly it's led me to realize, and I'm sorry if this sounds offensive, it's not my intent, but what other conclusion can I draw... most people aren't very bright. Forget IQ tests, they're not a very good indicator of intelligence. Intelligence is not something you get in a classroom, you either have it and use it, or you have it and don't use it. Or you don't have it at all. I think it's unlikely that too many people don't have it at all, so it boils down to making a choice to use it or not use it. When tens of millions of people consistently choose to not use it, that is not an intelligent choice. It's not very bright at all. It's not even acting in one's own best interest to ignore what could be very critical information that could save your life, or your children's lives, or prevent disease, or stop the government from doing some unforgivable wrong.

If you ask people, would you choose to get sick? They'd say no. Would you choose to allow fraud to be perpetrated on us by government? Of course not. Would you choose to be informed about what you're eating and drinking when it's been tampered with and turned into something creepy? Of course. Then why do you refuse to make those choices every single time they come up? Why do you consistently opt to get sick, support the fraud, and keep eating toxic waste and feeding it to your kids? That's when they look at you and blink, and get this blank expression on their face. The little wheels in their head are turning and facts are having an arm wrestling match with the programming we all have so deeply embedded in our brains. And with far too few exceptions, the programming over rides tangible, provable reality, time after time after time.

Every time this happens their eyes glaze over a little, and they just change the subject. It's scary as hell to watch it. They often show a little hostility too, they will flat out tell you they don't like having their sacred belief systems poked with a stick. It is I who is threatening them, not the reality I'm trying to alert them to. I'm the one who's trying to ruin their comfortable routine. After all, if I'd just shut my mouth, they could go to Walmart and stop by McDonalds on the way home which would make their kids happy. They could plop down in front of the TV after wards and stay happily oblivious, and get their daily download from the media bath we love to soak in every single day of our lives.

It makes my skin crawl.

I don't get frustrated much anymore because I finally understand I can't do anything about it. If folks want to choose to poison their own children, I can only take the time and trouble to print off pages of personal first hand testimonies, make CD's, and urge them to take five minutes out of their lives to read about the other side of vaccines, and put an end to the continual trips to the pediatrician and all that suffering and expense. But am I helping? Nope. Not a damn bit. Am I trying? Damn straight. And I'll never stop trying. Why? Because I have to. I cannot adopt an attitude of "Oh well, I guess you're on your own Sparky. You're walking right over a cliff and I'm just going to stand here and watch". Not a cell in my body could stand still and do nothing to prevent another person from impending doom.

It's interesting too that what it would take to stop them is literally physically stopping them. Grabbing them and forcing them to get a grip. But that's illegal, and it's also pointless. It's like the old saying, "You can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink". I can bring people critical facts and information, but I can't make them think. But just like horses need water to survive, people need information critical to their lives in order to make intelligent choices for themselves and their communities, and frankly, some choices affect the world for a very long time. You have to keep leading those horses to water, and you have to keep putting the information in people's hands whether they decide to go for it or not.

The only risk I run is making people dread laying eyes on me, so I have to go slow, be unwavering, and keep my mouth shut no matter how stupid they're acting. And it's hard sometimes. But it is their life, not mine. I'm just sorry that so many people don't seem to recognize who their real friends are. I mean, why trust someone you've known for years, decades even, who you respect, like, and find very credible, who is concerned for your well-being and has nothing to gain by trying to influence you to make choices that could potentially benefit you; when you can just flick on the 6 o'clock news and let a perfect stranger who doesn't know you exist pump the daily download into your brain? Obviously they're a much better choice.

When people are no longer able to recognize who their friends are, it doesn't look good for us. And you know what? It doesn't look good for us. At least I'll go to my grave with a clear conscience, that's all I can take with me when I go. We've been lied to so much for so long it feels normal. That makes me mad enough to know I'll never stop trying to set things straight, as unlikely as it is I'll succeed. Every now and then, someone comes around and that makes every last bit of it worth it.

Saturday, May 05, 2007

March of the Illegals 2

When I saw the first "march of the illegals" last year in 2006, I knew it was wrong in more than one way. Everything about it was impossible, from the size of it, to all the matching white shirts and identical little flags, to the total lack of interference by any of our well paid with full benefits public servants.

How could this enormous nationwide protest have been organized and coordinated? It takes years to spread the word from person to person nationwide about anything, if the last five years I've been observing the 9-11 truth movement is any indicator. Without big corporate dollars and professional level coordination, how could a network of non-English speaking illegal status aliens, without computer access or technical knowledge be able to pull off these huge dress alike protests and get the media to show up? How did they even manage to contact each other? Is there an "Illegals Yellow Pages"? It doesn't make sense.

We've had countless well attended peace protests not even register as a hiccup on CNN or any corporate news channel. When the big boys want you out, you're out. Without cash and connections, gigantic movements like this just aren't possible. It becomes quickly obvious that these "protests" have received all the right kinds of help.

Generally speaking, and I'm no history buff, but when a million people from another country cross over the border, isn't that usually taken as a very threatening thing by government? If the word "defense" could ever have been used in it's truest sense by our Defense Dept., they certainly missed their chance. They slept right through it.

Unconcerned with a foreign invasion now totaling well over 30 million, the defense department and the entire federal government continues to sleep right through it even though we've now had a second formal march of illegals in our cities, who were again petitioning our government to redress their grievances. How do non-citizens have the right to demand anything from our government?

I'm confused by our officials total lack of interest in these marches. What exactly constitutes an invasion that would get the government's attention, and what constitutes an invasion that doesn't? I'm not clear on this. Is there such a thing as a "good" invasion? If so, how can we tell the difference and could the DOD possibly be troubled to make a public announcement to clarify which type we have going on here today, and what their official position is on it? We were unaware there was more than one position on these things.

If millions of largely unwelcomed foreigners came here without an invitation, which they did, if they came here knowing they were breaking the law, and they did, if they lay low once they get here, and they do; and if American citizens are suffering the destruction of private property, increased violent crime, a rash of various treacherous diseases, gang violence, murder by car, hospital bankruptcies and closures, and none too subtle economic impacts, which they are, and if the government has no response to this, then it's obvious we need the word "security" redefined. We need the word "law" redefined as well, because it appears there is a sudden and wide gray area where there has never been one before. Is this a natural and expected legal loop hole, or is it an engineered one without the knowledge or consent of 99.9% of America's taxpaying citizenry? Because, it really does matter.

I'd like an answer to that please.

The real problem I see is that during this time of bush's War on terror, where American citizens caught jay walking are now doing prison time on terror charges and absolute strangers who clearly aren't from here, are coming and going, traveling and working, finding housing and funding, receiving free medical care for entire families that follow behind them... our mr. bush is absolutely unfazed by this. Is he or isn't he the terror meister? Does he actually fail to see the glaring rift in our national security in the form of our green light wide open borders? Because without so much as one security briefing under my belt, I couldn't possibly miss it.

With estimates of somewhere between thirty million to sixty million illegal residents living in our country today, and thousands more coming by the week, I'd say we have a big security hole to plug. This isn't something that's happened one or two times, it's happened thirty million times. Successfully. Does anyone else see an opportunity to correct a serious flaw in the security system here?

In spite of what appears to me as a five alarm security breach, our FBI continues to surveil church going peace activists and continues to come up empty handed for any 9-11 terrorists. In fact, we've uncovered precisely zero actual "terrorists". Yet no more than a few miles from any major police department across the country, there are myriad crimes being carried out by illegal trespassers and I don't have to ask their victims if they feel any terror. It goes without saying.

While our federal, state and local law enforcement agencies turn the other cheek to this illegal invasion, they are increasing their brutality on our own citizens, and forcing the constitution up against the wall with it's hands behind it's head. We are stopped, searched, roadblocked, scanned, surveilled, photographed, filmed, ordered, mandated, required, recorded, wiretapped, x-rayed, retina scanned, finger print scanned, flying barefoot, passport chipped, and Federal ID carded to the point that it feels more like Berlin in the 30's than the "land of the free". This phrase needs updating too. This is now "the land of the once free".

Every simple error a legal citizen makes on American soil is now greeted with unneccesary brutality and force, and mandatory sentencing. All crimes are considered terror now. Except, it seems, crossing illegally over our borders. That is no longer troublesome to the authorities. It would behoove the government to make a general announcement when it decides to make major changes of this kind. Illegal trespass during a terror clamp down is NOT considered worrisome, but 5 people handing out home made flyers to end the war in Iraq are getting full workups and security jackets at the FBI.

I am confused.

Something else that confuses me about these highly publicized protests is how foreign trespassers get off petitioning my government for anything. It's a bit surreal. They aren't legal citizens. They don't vote. They can't possibly be greasing the palms of our loyal and dedicated Congress because what kinds of jobs can they have without legal status or the ability to speak English? They simply "broke in" and helped themselves to our country, illegally, without an invitation, and we're footing the bill for it; and that amounts to federal level theft and trespassing at the very least. By every definition of logic and law, they and we alike should expect nothing more than their immediate arrest and deportation upon our discovering them here.

But instead of vans and buses pulling up to surround these illegal residents of our country, they were actually allowed to give dozens of speeches in front of the white house last year, undisturbed by Immigration officials, police, security guards, or hate mongers. They were splashed across televisions and newspapers everywhere, and their illegal status was embraced with teary eyed humanistic warmth. No newscaster, emcee, or famous face, political or otherwise, appeared to rebut the claims of illegal foreign occupiers having some "right" to be here and to demand anything of our government whatsoever. Can you imagine what would happen if a million Americans entered some other country illegally and massed in their streets demanding that laws be passed to accommodate us?

Perhaps our law enforcement people were just as stunned as I was. They were all simply too stunned to move a muscle. That must be it. Either that or the obvious. The bush administration has revoked the borders and is not only welcoming foreigners here to perform next to free labor for major corporate interests, they are assisting them and protecting them from arrest and deportation regardless of the serious crimes and damage being done to our legal citizenry.

I'd say we have a huge variance in our ideas of what national security and sovereignty mean. Can someone please send mr. bush a dictionary? Send dictionaries to Congress too, if you have spare ones lying around. It appears there's an utter dearth of dictionaries to be found anywhere in Washington DC and we, the people, will be happy to help these folks out. And by the way mr. bush, Congress, look up security and sovereignty, and if we're not on the same page anymore, you need to let us know.

Tuesday, May 01, 2007


I find it very odd that US "health officials" put out such consistently grim and frightening messages. Whenever they address the public it's always about something horrific. Just when we finally manage to let go of the last semi-traumatic announcement they've made, out they come to remind us again that the future looks impossibly dreadful, and there's no way to escape it. It's disconcerting and I think it undermines our collective emotional energies. It kind of sucks.

I have never been so endlessly alarmed by so many things at once in my entire life, not even when Russia had all those nukes pointed at us. Between the CDC and the bush administration, I'm ready for sedatives and high blood pressure medication.

Take for instance this article on April 27, 2007 from Reuters, U.S. health agency stages bird flu WAR GAME. It begins, "A leading U.S. health agency staged a war game this week to test its response to one of the worst health emergencies it could imagine -- an outbreak of avian flu on American soil. The exercise, which ended on Friday, was designed to simulate how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would marshal its resources, coordinate with other branches of government and, crucially, reassure the public while preparing it for a possible pandemic.

"If we were at the beginning of a pandemic this is exactly what it would look like," said CDC Director Julie Gerberding at a news conference early in the 48-hour drill, which involved hundreds of officials.

If things turn out wrong it could lead to a "catastrophe beyond our planning," she said."

Julie Gerberding, as you may recall, is the evil step twin of Katherine Harris, both of whom make me spontaneously spit whenever I hear their names.

Now I ask you, did anything about the above mentioned article so far seem reassuring to you? It struck me as more scary than reassuring.

In the first place, the use of the words "War Game" is a bit unsettling. It's not very comforting to see ourselves as under siege, as in a battle, as in a war, with the CDC riding gunner in the Abrams Medi-Tanks. I really prefer their old image, the mild mannered compassionate, dedicated, brave medical scientists wearing white coats under hermetically sealed space suits, watching us melt into our sheets while they say things like, "Ewww! Well, he's a goner!"

It may not have looked good for us, but at least we weren't abandoned in that old imagery. Dustin Hoffman was there, and most of all, the doctors weren't carrying machine guns. I'm finding it difficult to believe I could relax and endure a 104 degree fever while watching a bayonet being slung over the nurse's, er, medic's shoulder. It's just not an environment conducive to healing, or hope. Or even life.

The whole news article is heavily studded with military words and images, and with graphic extremes that couldn't reassure anyone. No, I'm sorry, this article was purposely crafted to scare the bejeebers out of us.

'One of the worst health emergencies it could imagine'. Isn't imagination limitless? This isn't subtle. It's literally the worst thing I've ever heard in regard to public health. And what is this 'worst thing' health emergency? It's an outbreak of Avian Flu on American soil.

All right, wait, two questions.

1. Are people catching this from people yet or is it still just a bird disease? The last I heard, bird is the word. You'd have to come into direct contact with an infected bird in order to get these germs into your own body, and you know how that happens, right? It means you have to handle and ingest bird doody. I know for a fact, I don't eat bird doody. How about you? I'm not feeling particularly threatened by bird flu; because it's a bird disease that you have to eat bird doody to get. Really, I'm safe as can be.

2. The avian flu hasn't even jumped species yet. How can they be so all fired sure it will not only jump species to humans, but will be So Virulent that we'll be turning into pink jello by the thousands? Do they have a crystal ball or something? A Ouija Board? Is The Amazing Kreskin on staff with the CIA? Because that's one HELL of a leap to take. Human Avian Flu doesn't even exist yet but it's going to cream us in droves? How would they know?

Didn't they say similar scary stuff about the Swine Flu too? And didn't it turn out that the only thing killing people was the nasty vaccine they started passing around? Yes it did turn out that way, and it was a bit of a scandal too because big Pharma & the Gov't both knew that vaccine caused heart attacks before they started sending it out all over the country, and they quashed any voices trying to reach the public to warn us. It took some bodacious brave guy from Australia to leak it to the press here, and just in the nick of time. People died of heart attacks, but not nearly as many as would have, if the word hadn't gotten out. See? Our government was a slimy batch of skunks even way back then, it's nothing new.

This war game took the form of a 48 hour drill which involved "hundreds of officials". That's a whole lot of officials. This was one big preparedness drill. They didn't say what kind of officials they were. Were they medical officials? State officials? Government officials? Military officials? You know, if it were any of my first three guesses, they would have just said so. It would have been reassuring. But if they were my last guess, military officials, I can see why they chose to leave that out. It would definitely NOT be reassuring. It would actually spark a panic, at least in my choners it would.

Excuse me but I'm not seeing the auto-connect between a public health crisis and calling in the troops. Do you see a logical link there? If you do, please fill me in, I'm at a loss. Are they just going to shoot us all if we get sick? Is that their big plan? I have to say, I would really have a problem with that.

What "other branches of government" did they coordinate with? They didn't choose to mention that either, and I'm funny because I like details. I really like facts, names, dates, specifics. It makes it so much more meaningful when they give you enough information to be able to see with your own two eyes the real messages in articles like these.

Wait a minute. This war game ended on the 27th, which means it overlapped with Operation Noble Resolve '07 which started two days earlier and also ended on the 27th. They were doing major war games exercises too, simulating a terrorist nuclear attack on American soil. I highly doubt this is an unrelated coincidence. Why on earth didn't the papers mention this? That would be news. So what are they expecting, that we'll get nuked and bio-terrorized at the same time? Are these people nuts? Yes, of course they are, but still, this is crazy. Is there really no better use for our tax dollars?

Can't they try diplomacy just once instead of bombs?

What am I saying? What a ridiculous notion.

So now hundreds of officials have been put through these major military/CDC exercises, and the officials among us are prepped and conditioned to expect the worst health crisis on American soil imaginable. What kind of prep have WE gotten? I've gotten none. Did you get any?

Do you know what to do if you get this horrendous strain of flu? Do you know how to tell if that's what it is? Do you know how the flu will play out? Or how "deadly" it is? Or whether you'll be forcibly confined to home and not allowed to break quarantine or you'll be shot? Because they will shoot you, according to UCSF's Dr. George Rutherford's Pandemic Preparedness lecture, as given to some doe eyed baby med students. It aired on UCTV on April 9th.

It made me hyperventilate frankly. The last thing I'd ever have expected to see is such crass and blatant disregard for human life becoming something so acceptable. The students, hearing about healthy people being caught up in a sweep and taken to death tents during the next flu pandemic, found the idea funny.

I didn't find it funny.

Something that has bothered me from day one with this bird flu thing is how they can claim such all fired certainty that a major pandemic is unquestionably coming. They say they are positive to an unprecedented degree. "It's just a matter of time", they say, "It's long over due". "It will happen, there's no doubt about it, it's just a matter of when".

They all say it together too, in perfect harmony. Where are the scientists who disagree with our heroes? I know they're out there. It's always a danger signal to me when anything is served up to us in perfect unison and without plenty of strong, credible dissenting voices to add to the chorus. It's simply not possible that everyone agrees on this. When has this country ever agreed on anything in one giant voice? I'd like to hear all takes on this, because I don't understand how they can go around telling us to live in abject terror over a nonexistent threat from a bird virus, and expect me to believe this isn't a hand job.

Okay you Amazing Seers of the Future, when is the next crop blight going to happen? And which crop will it smite? Will it be global and catastrophic or just hit America? Will a bunch of us die? Will you call out the Army? Are you doing anything to stop it from happening, or to stock pile the crop for us while the blight lasts? Can you predict earthquakes too?

Where are they getting this unshakable certainty from? I'd like to see their data. Do they even have any data? This can only be based on some statistical formula, and who put it together? Is it legitimate? Has it been vetted by independent outside sources? Because the fact is, statistics can be made to say ANYthing. Anything at all. They're nothing more than a constructed, carefully crafted means to an end. It's always political. I mean, when was the last time you remember something happening and you thought, "Dang! That statistical data I saw once was right on the nose!"

It never happens. Because it's all crap.

These health agencies all paint very threatening pictures of a bird flu pandemic, just the kind of thing that pulls the rug out from under us and keeps us all anxious and afraid. They say it could be huge, and roll across the country like a giant bowling ball, sending us flying to hospitals and quarantine areas like snot dripping coughing bowling pins.

They say, it could be too much for even WE, the "great" CDC to predict it's destructive capacity. It may very well exceed our mental ability to comprehend, it's that huge.

How big is it? Why, it's bigger than CHINA. It's bigger than THE MOON!!!! It could sweep through our county in the blink of an eye leaving a devastating trail of pus oozing corpses, bleeding from their eyeballs in it's wake. But we don't want to scare you, we want to reassure you.

It would be very unprofessional of us to come out here and be alarmists. We are Scientists. We're professionals. We know what we're talking about and we need to make sure not to scare the wits out of you without absolute need. We're only bringing this up to encourage you. Yes, it could kill practically everyone. No, there is absolutely no way to defend yourself against it; and yes, it is extremely deadly. Yes, it could bring on martial law, because martial law as you know is excellent at stopping pandemics in mid spread and making everyone well again.

So. That's why they've teamed up with the entire joint forces of the United States Military and engaged in simulated, interdepartmental War Games. They want to reassure us.

Yeah, maybe so. But of what?

Is this what they call predictive programming? Are they gently releasing the idea of the country going in to full blown martial law with troops and militarized police in the streets, ordering us around and shooting us at will? Are we supposed to express our outrage now, before it happens, so it will fall on deaf ears and be dismissed as politically motivated nonsense? And each consecutive time the CDC, the government and the news media want to remind us to be very afraid of impending doom, will we become less upset, more hopeless, and finally numbed? When they finally do pronounce martial law and the end of all rights, will we just go quietly along believing it's best, or that it makes sense, or that we can't fight them? Are we simply being conditioned to accept the idea of the game plan they've got lined up for us?

It sure looks that way to me. I'd say we've been formally notified of exactly what they intend to do when they release their ultra deadly defense department made flu Bio-weapons on us. Are the boys at the top all on Cipro again, like they were before the anthrax mail scam was pulled?

It is clear that this government is not being honest with us. It's non-debateable that we are steadily and endlessly lied to. It will end when we decide to end it. But we won't. It's about that simple.


Here is an interesting link to a quick read that puts the safety of vaccines in real perspective.
The $75,000 Vaccine Challenge.